Court of Appeal voids Obono-Obla’s power…

Must read

Tambuwal Condoles Borno Empire Over Massacre

... We'll Work With Borno Government On Our Citizens That Were Victims By Muhammad Ibrahim, Sokoto

Agriculture Can Alternate Oil To Salvage Nigeria Economy – Commissioner

By Noah Ocheni, Lokoja The Kogi State Commissioner For Agriculture, Mr David Apeh on Monday in Lokoja warned that...

FG Lobbying For Covid-19 Vaccines From Foreign Partners

By Williams Anuku Abuja While advanced nations are looking up to consolidate on the Covid-19 vaccine produced by pharmaceutical...

FG seeks collaboration to win war against child abuse – Dame Tallen

...as Cece Yara child advocacy opens Abuja officeBy Mike ObohTo strengthen the war against child abuse and other related offences, there is...

…sets aside forfeiture order of Tumsah brothers properties

The Court of Appeal, Abuja Division yesterday held that the Chief Okoi Obono-Obla led the Presidential Panel on Assets Recovery lacked prosecutorial power and hence cannot initiate criminal proceedings against an accused person.

The further held that the panel lacked the constitutional power to seize properties of alleged offenders.

The judgment of the court was a sequel to an appeal filed by a staff of the Federal Ministry of Power, Works and Housing, Tijani Tumsah through his counsel, Kehinde Ogunwumiju SAN.

The panel had approached the High Court and obtained an order forfeiting his properties, alongside that of his brother, Ibrahim Tumsah, who is the Director of Finance and Accounts in Ministry of Power, Works and Housing.

Not satisfied, Tijani had approached the appellate court challenging the prosecutorial power of the panel.

Asides the Tumsah brothers that are being prosecuted by the panel, the panel has also filed a charge against the deputy Senate president, Ike Ekweremadu, Senators Hope Uzodinma, and Stella Oduah

However, in a unanimous judgment, a five-man panel of the court led by Justice Hussein Muhktar who began to read the judgment at about 6:15 pm held that going the Act that established the panel, it lacks the power to prosecute an offender.

The court further held that the powers of the panel are only limited to investigation and not prosecution.

In the appeal, Ogunwumiju had asked the court to determine whether the suit culminating in the forfeiture order against him was validly instituted by the panel before the court below.

The appellant also asked the appellate court to determine whether or not the panel could validly rely on the EFCC Act to obtain the freezing order granted by the lower court on December 6, 2017.

Also, the appellant asked the court to determine whether or not the lower court was right when it refused to set aside its interim freezing order of December 6, 2016.

The court however resolved all the three issues in favor of the appellant.

It held that nothing in the Recovery of Public Property Act Cap R 4, LFN 2004 empowers the panel to initiate court proceedings pursuant to its investigative powers for the purpose of obtaining an interim order for forfeiture of property

According to the court, ” the panel cannot clothe itself with the cloth not given to it by the Act that established it. It cannot take over the responsibilities of the EFCC.

“The power to investigate and prosecute is solely for the EFCC and such cannot be taken over by any person or agency.

“The provision of the Act is unambiguous and not confusing. The powers of the panel are to conduct investigation on any officer who has corruptly enriched himself of breached the code of conduct.

“No power or authority is conferred on the panel to prosecute offenders.

” The ex-parte order granted by the lower court as regards the properties of the appellant is hereby set aside.

“The court below lacks the jurisdiction to entertain the matter, let alone enter judgment”.

The court held that suit instituted against the appellants at the lower court was not properly instituted.

The court further held that the Panel cannot take over the power of the EFCC in prosecuting criminal cases.

The court also held that the lower court was wrong for failing to set aside its forfeiture order.

Earlier, Justice Muhktar had explained why the judgment was delivered late in the day.

According to him, the judgment was earlier scheduled for today, but the panel got the hint that a nationwide strike may begin, hence the need to deliver the judgment yesterday evening.

- Advertisement -

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

Latest article

Tambuwal Condoles Borno Empire Over Massacre

... We'll Work With Borno Government On Our Citizens That Were Victims By Muhammad Ibrahim, Sokoto

Agriculture Can Alternate Oil To Salvage Nigeria Economy – Commissioner

By Noah Ocheni, Lokoja The Kogi State Commissioner For Agriculture, Mr David Apeh on Monday in Lokoja warned that...

FG Lobbying For Covid-19 Vaccines From Foreign Partners

By Williams Anuku Abuja While advanced nations are looking up to consolidate on the Covid-19 vaccine produced by pharmaceutical...

FG seeks collaboration to win war against child abuse – Dame Tallen

...as Cece Yara child advocacy opens Abuja officeBy Mike ObohTo strengthen the war against child abuse and other related offences, there is...

Insecurity: We need better weapons to fight insurgents – Lai Mohammed

Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed, on Monday, in Makurdi, the Benue State capital advanced the reason why Boko Haram activities...