Category: Science and Technology

  • Blast From the Past: Breakthrough in Centuries-Old Effort to Unravel Astronomical Mystery

    Blast From the Past: Breakthrough in Centuries-Old Effort to Unravel Astronomical Mystery

    An international team of astronomers using Gemini North’s GNIRS instrument have discovered that CK Vulpeculae, first seen as a bright new star in 1670, is approximately five times farther away than previously thought. This makes the 1670 explosion of CK Vulpeculae much more energetic than previously estimated and puts it into a mysterious class of objects that are too bright to be members of the well-understood type of explosions known as novae, but too faint to be supernovae.

    350 years ago, the French monk Anthelme Voituret saw a bright new star flare into life in the constellation of Vulpecula. Over the following months, the star became almost as bright as Polaris (the North Star) and was monitored by some of the leading astronomers of the day before it faded from view after a year.[1] The new star eventually gained the name CK Vulpeculae and was long considered to be the first documented example of a nova — a fleeting astronomical event arising from an explosion in a close binary star system in which one member is a white dwarf, the remnant of a Sun-like star. However, a string of recent results have thrown the longstanding classification of CK Vulpeculae as a nova into doubt.

    In 2015, a team of astronomers suggested that CK Vulpeculae’s appearance in 1670 was the result of two normal stars undergoing a cataclysmic collision. Just over three years later, the same astronomers further proposed that one of the stars was in fact a bloated red giant star, following their discovery of a radioactive isotope of aluminum in the immediate surroundings of the site of the 1670 explosion. Complicating the picture even further, a separate group of astronomers proposed a different interpretation. In their paper, also published in 2018, they suggested that the sudden brightening in 1670 was the result of the merger between a brown dwarf — a failed star too small to shine via thermonuclear fusion that powers the Sun — and a white dwarf.

    Now, adding to the ongoing mystery surrounding CK Vulpeculae, new observations from the international Gemini Observatory, a Program of NSF’s NOIRLab, reveal that this enigmatic astronomical object is much farther away and has ejected gas at much higher speeds than previously reported.

    This chart of the position of a new star (marked in red) that appeared in the year 1670 was recorded by the famous astronomer Hevelius and was published by the Royal Society in England in their journal Philosophical Transactions. Credit: Royal Society

    This team, led by Dipankar Banerjee of Physical Research Laboratory Ahmedabad, India, Tom Geballe of Gemini Observatory, and Nye Evans of Keele University in the United Kingdom, initially planned to use the Gemini Near-Infrared Spectrograph (GNIRS) instrument on Gemini North on Hawai‘i’s Maunakea to confirm the 2018 detection of radioactive aluminum at the heart of CK Vulpeculae.[2] After realizing that detecting this in the infrared would be far more difficult than they originally thought, the astronomers improvised and obtained infrared observations across the full extent of CK Vulpeculae, including the two wisps of nebulosity at its outermost edges.

    “The key to our discovery was the GNIRS measurements obtained at the outer edges of the nebula,” elaborated Geballe. “The signature of redshifted and blueshifted iron atoms detected there shows that the nebula is expanding much more rapidly than previous observations had suggested.”[3]

    As lead author and astronomer Banerjee explains further, “We did not suspect that this is what we would find. It was exciting when we found some gas traveling at the unexpectedly high speed of about 7 million km/hour. This hinted at a different story about CK Vulpeculae than what had been theorized.”

    This wide-field view shows the sky around the location of the historical exploding star CK Vulpeculae. The remains of the nova are only very faintly visible at the center of this picture. Credit: ESO/Digitized Sky Survey 2. Acknowledgment: Davide De Martin

    By measuring both the speed of the nebula’s expansion and how much the outermost wisps had moved during the last ten years, and accounting for the tilt of the nebula on the night sky, which had been estimated earlier by others, the team determined that CK Vulpeculae lies approximately 10,000 light-years distant from the Sun — about five times as far away as previously thought. That implies that the 1670 explosion was far brighter, releasing roughly 25 times more energy than previously estimated.[4] This much larger estimate of the amount of energy released means that whatever event caused the sudden appearance of CK Vulpeculae in 1670 was far more violent than a simple nova.

    “In terms of energy released, our finding places CK Vulpeculae roughly midway between a nova and a supernova,” commented Evans. “It is one of a very few such objects in the Milky Way and the cause — or causes — of the outbursts of this intermediate class of objects remain unknown. I think we all know what CK Vulpeculae isn’t, but no one knows what it is.”

    The visual appearance of the CK Vulpeculae nebula and the high velocities observed by the team could help astronomers to recognize relics of similar events — in our Milky Way or in external galaxies — that have occurred in the past.

    “It is difficult at this stage to offer a definitive or compelling explanation for the origin of the 1670 eruption of CK Vulpeculae,” concluded Banerjee. “Even 350 years after Voituret’s discovery, the nature of the explosion remains a mystery. ”

  • Physicists Successfully Modify a Semiconductor to Create a Superconductor

    Physicists Successfully Modify a Semiconductor to Create a Superconductor

    Three physicists in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, together with their colleagues from the Southern University of Science and Technology and Sun Yat-sen University in China, have successfully modified a semiconductor to create a superconductor.

    Professor and Department Head Hanno Weitering, Associate Professor Steve Johnston, and PhD candidate Tyler Smith were part of the team that made the breakthrough in fundamental research, which may lead to unforeseen advancements in technology.

    Semiconductors are electrical insulators but conduct electrical currents under special circumstances. They are an essential component in many of the electronic circuits used in everyday items including mobile phones, digital cameras, televisions, and computers.

    As technology has progressed, so has the development of semiconductors, allowing the fabrication of electronic devices that are smaller, faster, and more reliable.

    Superconductors, first discovered in 1911, allow electrical charges to move without resistance, so current flows without any energy loss. Although scientists are still exploring practical applications, superconductors are currently used most widely in MRI machines.

    Using a silicon semiconductor platform — which is the standard for nearly all electronic devices — Weitering and his colleagues used tin to create the superconductor.

    “When you have a superconductor and you integrate it with a semiconductor, there are also new types of electronic devices that you can make,” Weitering stated.

    Superconductors are typically discovered by accident; the development of this novel superconductor is the first example ever of intentionally creating an atomically thin superconductor on a conventional semiconductor template, exploiting the knowledge base of high-temperature superconductivity in doped ‘Mott insulating’ copper oxide materials.

    “The entire approach — doping a Mott insulator, the tin on silicon — was a deliberate strategy. Then came proving we’re seeing the properties of a doped Mott insulator as opposed to anything else and ruling out other interpretations. The next logical step was demonstrating superconductivity, and lo and behold, it worked,” Weitering said.

    “Discovery of new knowledge is a core mission of UT,” Weitering stated. “Although we don’t have an immediate application for our superconductor, we have established a proof of principle, which may lead to future practical applications.”

  • Your data and how it is used to gain your vote

    Your data and how it is used to gain your vote

    How much do political parties know about you – and how is it used to try to sway your vote?

    The Cambridge Analytica scandal threw light on how the Facebook data of millions was harvested and turned into a messaging tool.

    The revelations were criticised far and wide by politicians of all stripes.

    But now, a report from the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) puts the spotlight on the relationship between data brokers and the politicians here.

    Should we be concerned?

    Even limited information can be used in surprising ways, the ICO report found.

    For example, buying someone’s name can lead to making guesses about their income, number of children and ethnicity – which is then used to tailor a political message for them.

    The report suggests that the Conservative Party is doing just that, using so-called “onomastic data”: information derived from the study of people’s names which could identify their ethnic origin or religion.

    It has done that for 10 million voters, most of whom will be unaware of exactly how their information is being used.

    Political parties can legitimately hold personal data on individuals to help them campaign more effectively. But sophisticated data analytics software can now combine information about individuals from multiple sources to find more about their voting characteristics and interests – something some people may find disturbing.

    “Data collection is out of control and we need to put limits on what is collected,” says Lucy Purdon from Privacy International (PI).

    So how do the parties get my data in the first place?

    The electoral register forms “the spine” of data sources, according to PI, but beyond that it is surprisingly difficult to work out what the parties use.

    What has become clearer in recent months is the role of data brokers. Both the Conservatives and the Labour Party make use of a product from Experian called Mosaic, according to the Open Rights Group (ORG), which describes Experian as being a “one-stop shop for data used in political profiling”.

    Experian is better known as a credit rating agency, but it also acts as a data broker, along with others such as Equifax and Transunion.

    They collect data themselves or buy it from other companies, such as a credit card company. They also crawl the internet for useful information about people and aggregate that with data from other sources.

    They then sell it on to advertisers – or, in this case, to political parties.

    A two-year investigation by the ICO found that millions of adults in the UK had had their data processed by Experian. The ICO recommended a long list of improvements the company needed to make in order to comply with the EU-wide GDPR law on data privacy.

    A PI complaint sparked the ICO investigation. PI says “it is a complex and opaque industry, and we are just starting to chip away at how this eco-system works”.

    How do political parties use your data?

    Having data on a person means that political messages can be personalised, and while this is a good way to hammer home specific messages, it could be argued that it is also giving people only part of the story about any given political issue.

    According to PI it helps to create “echo chambers, polarise votes and restrict political debate”.

    “If someone has the given name Mohammed, for example, it may be inferred that they are from an immigrant family and so messages about immigration can be tailored,” says Jim Killock from the ORG.

    “Or if there are two people with the same surname living at an address, it can be guessed that they may be married and messaging tailored to that.”

    What do the political parties say?

    The BBC has asked the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats how they use data and where they receive it from. None have replied.

    The ORG conducted its own investigation and as part of its research it asked people to request all data political parties held on them, something known as a Data Subject Access Request. Few got responses but the scant information gleaned included:

    • Labour had compiled up to 100 pages of data per individuals, broken down into over 80 categories
    • Liberal Democrats attempted to guess the number of families in a home, and an individual’s age based on name
    • Conservatives attempted to estimate how likely an individual was to read and enjoy the Daily Mail, as well as guessing income

    It also asked all parties whether they used data broker services in the 2019 election, but only the Liberal Democrats confirmed they did not, stating they felt it would not be compliant with the GDPR privacy law.

    The Labour Party did not reply. The Conservatives said that they did purchase commercially available data, but did not say what they did with it.

    Following the ICO revelations about onomastic data, the ORG has contacted the Conservative Party asking if it still uses this data. It has not yet had a response.

    Much of the use of personal data by political parties is done under the banner of democratic engagement, which is used to justify a wide range of profiling activities.

    What can be done about it?

    The ICO says political parties need to be much clearer about how they intend to use personal data.

    But the Open Rights Group thinks it needs much tougher action.

    “If it does not crack down, there is no incentive for better behaviour,” it said.

    One of the obvious ways would be to allow voters the ability to refuse the sharing of their data between a political party and a third party, such as a data broker.

    GDPR stipulates that individuals should know exactly how their data is being used and agree to that.

    But that could be harder because of how little is known about what data is being collected in the first place, PI’s Ms Purdon said.

    “The data broker industry is so complex and while the GDPR gave people more rights over their data, how are you supposed to exercise those rights if don’t even know a company is collecting your data and profiling you?”

  • UK To Impose Tougher Rules On Google, Facebook

    UK To Impose Tougher Rules On Google, Facebook

    Britain announced Friday it will set up a watchdog to regulate tech giants such as Facebook and Google and improve their transparency on using people’s data and personalised advertising.

    The Department for Culture, Media and Sport said in a statement that the new regulator, the Digital Markets Unit, will “govern the behaviour of platforms that currently dominate the market, such as Google and Facebook”.

    The aim is “to ensure consumers and small businesses aren’t disadvantaged”, it said.

    The unit is being created after the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said in July that existing laws were not effective and a new regulatory regime was needed to control internet giants that earn from digital advertising.

    The CMA has backed the new rules while it has not taken direct action against Facebook and Google.

    “Our new, pro-competition regime for digital markets will ensure consumers have choice and mean smaller firms aren’t pushed out,” said Business Secretary Alok Sharma.

    Britain acknowledged the online platforms bring “huge benefits for businesses and society” but said the “concentration of power amongst a small number of tech companies” was curbing growth and innovation in the industry, which could have “negative impacts” for the public.

    A new statutory code will aim to make the tech giants “more transparent about the services they provide and how they are using consumers’ data”, it said.

    Consumers will be able to choose whether to see personalised advertising, the government said.

    The new regulator will be launched in April and could have powers to “suspend, block and reverse decisions of tech giants”, order them to take actions and impose fines.

    The new code could also mean online platforms have to offer fairer terms to news publications.

    There have been calls for Facebook and Google to give a larger share of their advertising revenue to media organisations whose content they use.

    According to the CMA, last year around 80 percent of the £14 billion ($18.7 billion, 15.7 billion euros) spent on digital advertising went to Google and Facebook.

    Newspapers are dependent on the online giants for traffic, with around 40 percent of visits to their sites coming via Facebook and Google.

    Google reacted by saying it wants to “work constructively” with the new regulator.

    Facebook is preparing to launch its Facebook News service in the UK, which works with news media and includes original reporting.

    It said it remains “committed to working with our UK industry partners to find ways to support journalism and help the long-term sustainability of news organisations”

    RELATED POSTS:

    UK announces closure of visa application centres in Nigeria

    #EndSARS: UK Parliament to consider petition demanding sanctions on Nigerian govt

    BREAKING: US, UK envoys meets FG over nationwide #EndSARS protests

  • Robot that can detect Coronavirus and enforce face mask rules undergoes trials

    Robot that can detect Coronavirus and enforce face mask rules undergoes trials

    A human-like robot that can test for coronavirus and tell patients off for not wearing a face mask is undergoing trials in a hospital.

    The trial is taking place at a private hospital in Cairo, Egypt, as the African county faces a second wave.

    The mechanical nurse, dubbed Cira-03, can take the temperature of Covid-19 sufferers and even perform blood tests.

    The robot has a human like face and robotic arms. 

    Robot that can detect coronavirus and enforce face mask rules undergoes trials

    Built by an Egyptian inventor, the robot can also perform echocardiograms, X-rays and display the results to patients on a screen installed in its chest.

    The bot was designed to look as realistic as possible to stop patients from being afraid, according to inventor Mahmoud El Komy.

    It tests a patient for coronavirus by cupping their chin and then extending its arm with a swab into their mouth.

    El Komy said Cira-03 will help limit exposure to the infection and prevent transmission.

    Robot that can detect coronavirus and enforce face mask rules undergoes trials

    He said: “I tried to make the robot seem more human so that the patient doesn’t fear it. So they don’t feel like a box is walking in on them.

    “There has been a positive response from patients.

    “They saw the robot and weren’t afraid. On the contrary, there is more trust in this because the robot is more precise than humans.”

    The remote controlled robot scuttles around the hospital on wheels.

    The trial comes as Egyptian authorities confirm the country faces a second spike in cases of coronavirus.

    In total, Egypt has seen 113,027 cases of the disease, with 6,548 deaths.

  • New Zealand mass stranding leaves nearly 100 whales dead

    New Zealand mass stranding leaves nearly 100 whales dead

    About 100 pilot whales and bottlenose dolphins have died in a mass stranding on the remote Chatham Islands, about 800km (497 miles) off New Zealand’s east coast, officials said.

    Most of them were stranded during the weekend but rescue efforts have been hampered by the island’s remote location.

    New Zealand’s Department of Conservation on Wednesday said a total of 97 pilot whales and three dolphins died in the stranding, adding they were notified of the incident on Sunday.

    “Only 26 of the whales were still alive at this point, the majority of them appearing very weak, and were euthanised due to the rough sea conditions and almost certainty of there being great white sharks in the water which are brought in by a stranding like this,” said DOC Biodiversity Ranger Jemma Welch.

    Mass strandings are reasonably common on the Chatham Islands. In 1918, up to 1,000 animals died in a single mass stranding.

    Mass whale strandings have occurred throughout recorded modern history, and why it happens is a question that has puzzled marine biologists for years.

    In late September, several hundred whales died in shallow waters off the Australian coast in one of the world’s biggest mass whale strandings.

    RELATED POSTS:

    Cricket: West Indies’ IPL players face New Zealand isolation until day of first match of tour

    Jacinda Ardern wins New Zealand election for 2nd term

    New Zealand freezes $90m linked to cryptocurrency trader BTC-e

  • Pakistan bans TikTok for failing to filter vulgarity

    Pakistan bans TikTok for failing to filter vulgarity

    Tiktok’s failure to implement orders to filter immoral content prompted Pakistan’s telecommunications regulator to ban the video-sharing platform on Friday.

    The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority said in a statement that the Chinese app was being blocked after complaints of vulgarity from different segments of society.

    The authority said it had warned TikTok to filter immoral content, but the application had failed to abide by the instructions.

    The ban would be reviewed if the app’s administrator agrees not to let people upload objectionable content.

    The move comes months after live-streaming app Bigo Live was banned for the same reason and video-sharing platform YouTube was warned to block vulgarity and hate speech.

    Dating app Tinder has also been blocked in recent months by authorities in the conservative Islamic Republic.

    These moves were seen by activists as an attempt to muzzle online criticism of the country’s powerful military.

    YouTube introduced a localised version in Pakistan after a ban that lasted for several months in 2012 following protests against a movie deemed insulting to the Muslim prophet Muhammad.

    Censorship levels have increased since the government of Prime Minister, Imran Khan took office after elections in 2018 tainted by the allegations of army interference.

  • Federal court issues preliminary injunction halting Trump administration’s ban of Chinese app WeChat

    Federal court issues preliminary injunction halting Trump administration’s ban of Chinese app WeChat

    The Washington Post is reporting that a United States District Court in San Francisco has issued a preliminary injunction halting Trump administration’s ban of Chinese app WeChat

    the plaintiffs, a group of WeChat users, had shown there are “serious questions” related to their First Amendment claim.

    The Trump Administration had planned to effectively ban WeChat in the U.S. late Sunday night by preventing it from appearing in mobile-phone app stores, and by blocking the app’s access to Internet hosting services in the U.S.

    More details later

  • HUAWEI HARMONY OS OFFICIAL WEBSITE IS LIVE: SOURCE CODE IS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

    HUAWEI HARMONY OS OFFICIAL WEBSITE IS LIVE: SOURCE CODE IS AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD

    By Efe Udin EFE
    ‌‌‌‌‌‌
    Huawei officially launched the Hongmeng OS 2.0 system at the HDC Developers Conference. Today, the system released the developer Beta version for large screens, watches, and cars. The company also said that it will release the mobile version in December. After the launch, smartphones will fully support the Hongmeng 2.0. In addition, the official website of Huawei Harmony OS is now online, and the source code is available for download. The global version of Huawei Hongmeng OS is HarmonyOS.

    Starting from September 10, HarmonyOS will be open-source for 128KB-128MB terminal devices such as large screens, watches, and cars. In April 2021, it will be open-source for memory 128MB-4GB terminal devices, and after October 2021 it will be open-source for all devices above 4GB.

    Huawei Harmony OS is a “future-oriented” distributed operating system for all scenes (mobile office, sports health, social communications, media entertainment, etc.). Based on the traditional single-device system capability, HarmonyOS proposes a distributed concept based on the same system capability and adapting to multiple terminal forms, which can support multiple terminal devices.

    For consumers, HarmonyOS can integrate the capabilities of various terminals to form a “super virtual terminal”. It can achieve fast connection, mutual assistance, resource sharing between different terminal devices, and match suitable equipment. It also provides a smooth full-scene experience.
    For application developers, HarmonyOS uses a variety of distributed technologies. It makes application development independent of a particular form. This effectively reduces development difficulty and cost. This allows developers to focus on the upper-level business logic and develop applications more conveniently and efficiently.
    For device developers, HarmonyOS also adopts a componentized design scheme. In addition, it can be flexibly tailored according to the resource capabilities and business characteristics of the device to meet the requirements of different types of terminal devices for the operating system.

    Huawei is currently fighting a very intense battle, especially with the American government. It is facing multiple bans that are affecting its business. Since the beginning of last year, all Huawei new phones do not come with Google Mobile Service. This means that no PlayStore, no Gmail, and many other apps. In addition, it can no longer rely on TSMC to manufacturer its HiSilicon Kirin chips. This is as a result of the extended ban which the U.S. government imposed.

    According to Yu Chengdong, Huawei will release the Huawei Mate 40 series with Kirin chips in September this year. However, this may be the last phone that will use Kirin’s flagship processor. TSMC can not work on Huawei Kirin chips after September 15. This means that no new Kirin flagship can hit the market. According to Yu Chengond, the Mate 40 series will exhaust all the flagship Kirin chips. This is a very big loss for Huawei.


  • Signs You’ve Already Had Coronavirus Without Realizing It

    Signs You’ve Already Had Coronavirus Without Realizing It

    By Leah Groth

    It will likely be a while until we learn the results of major antibody studies to determine just how many people have already been infected with COVID-19—which will help determine just how close we are to achieving herd immunity we actually are.

    However, one thing is crystal clear: Many more people were infected with coronavirus than we previously thought. You might be wondering if you fall into that category. Here are 12 ways to help you figure out if you’ve already had coronavirus. Read on, and to ensure your health and the health of others, don’t miss these Sure Signs You’ve Already Had Coronavirus.

    1. A Positive Antibody Test

    Positive test result by using rapid test device for COVID-19, novel coronavirus 2019

    The only way to know if you have already been infected with COVID-19 is by taking an antibody test. “Unfortunately, outside of testing, there is no way you can determine if you’ve had COVID solely based on symptoms,” says Shannon Sovndal, MD, board-certified doctor in emergency medicine. “Many coronaviruses (as well as the flu) can make you feel similar. Additionally, COVID-19 may infect an individual and cause little or no symptoms.”

    2. You Experienced Symptoms Earlier in the Year.

    Sick man sleeps covered with a blanket lying in bed with high fever, resting at living room. He is exhausted and suffering from flu with cup of tea with lemon, medicaments. Influenza season.
    More
    In January and February, most of us didn’t realize the coronavirus was slowly spreading across the country. If you experienced any symptoms earlier in the year, you probably brushed them off as something else. However, there’s a decent chance you actually had COVID-19.

    3. You Lost Your Sense of Taste or Smell

    Did you experience a weird stint where you couldn’t taste or smell anything? Sharon Chekijian, MD, MPH, a Yale Medicine emergency medicine doctor and assistant professor at Yale School of Medicine, says it could have been coronavirus. “One sign that you were likely infected is a loss of smell and sometimes taste,” she explains. “Although other viruses or medical conditions can do this too, right now, it may mean you’re infected — even in the absence of other symptoms.”

    4. Thunderous Headache

    Headaches are one of the CDC’s most common symptoms. Since you might normally get them—due to stress, loud noises or body chemistry—you may not associate them with the coronavirus. But you should.

    5. You Experienced Bizarre Skin Issues

    While neither the WHO or CDC mentions skin rashes as a possible symptom of COVID, doctors across the country have reported various types of skin rashes—from COVID toes to rashes and lesions on the body —thought to be as a result of virus-related inflammation. In fact, the American Academy of Dermatology has set up a registry where healthcare workers can report cases of skin conditions that develop in COVID-19 patients, in hopes of understanding exactly why the virus is causing these issues.

    6. You Suffered a Period of Extreme Exhaustion

    Was there a time over the last few months, when you simply felt too tired to move? Maybe you thought it was due to a rigorous workout, or maybe a lack of sleep. But an overwhelming number of people who have coronavirus experience only mild symptoms, and a common one of those is extreme fatigue. As with any type of infection, your body uses energy to fight against it, and the result is feeling more tired than usual.

    7. You Had an Unrelenting Dry Cough

    According to Chinese researchers, 68 percent of coronavirus patients complain of a dry, continuous cough.

    8. You Had Pink Eye

    Pink eye is one of those pesky eye infections that most of us experience at some point in life. However, the American Academy of Ophthalmology points out that the condition, also called conjunctivitis, can be COVID-related. “Several reports suggest that SARS-CoV-2 can cause a mild follicular conjunctivitis otherwise indistinguishable from other viral causes, and possibly be transmitted by aerosol contact with conjunctiva,” they explained in a statement.

    9. You Were Plagued with Digestive Issues

    Did you experience diarrhea, nausea, or gas, and brush it off as something you ate or the stomach flu? “Some people have classic signs of COVID infection like body aches, fevers, headaches, cough and sometimes shortness of breath, but a lot of people are coming to the emergency department with nausea, diarrhea and abdominal pain,” Dr. Chekijian explains. “While we would usually think this is just a stomach bug, right now there’s a good chance that it’s COVID.”

    10. You Were Around Others Who Had It

    If you attended a conference, service, social event, protest or classes with others who were infected, you may not have dodged the infection bullet after all. Research has found that many people had COVID and never realized it because they were asymptomatic. One study found that many asymptomatic carriers were living in the same area as other people who tested positive.

    11. You Experienced Breathlessness

    If you were having trouble breathing, it could have been COVID-19. Because the virus is an infection of the upper respiratory tract, breathlessness—especially at rest—may have been a sign you were battling the virus.

    12. You Thought You Had the Flu

    Due to the fact that COVID’s spread occurred during cold and flu season—and the symptoms are quite similar—it’s very possible you were misdiagnosed even by your own doctor. For example, if you were really sick and took a flu test in January or February, before COVID tests were available, there’s a very good chance you had it.

    13. What to Do Next

    If you experienced any of the symptoms mentioned here, contact a medical professional. And to ensure your health and the health of others, don’t miss these 37 Places You’re Most Likely to Catch Coronavirus.