x

Focus on certified documents before the court showing descripancies between form EC8A, EC8B – Agabi tells tribunal

The petitioner, represented by Chief Kanu Godwin Agabi (SAN), presented their case on September 8, 2023, and filed it on September 9, 2023 has urged the court to focus on the certified documents before it showing descripancies between form EC8A and form EC8B.

Chief Kanu Godwin Agabi on Thursday during the adoption of final adresses argued that the precedent set by higher courts should guide the tribunal’s decision and emphasized that subpoenaed witnesses should not be allowed to testify under oath. He also stressed the importance of polling unit results (Form EC8As), considering them as the original results from reliable sources. He called on the tribunal to focus on certified documents, pointing out discrepancies between Form EC8As and EC8Bs and asserted that the petitioner, the PDP, should be declared the winner.

Agabi also questioned the absence of a cross-petition from the respondents, suggesting they had no substantial case. Tensions escalated during arguments, but the judges’ records ultimately favored the petitioner, as the respondents’ sincerity came into question.

The first respondent, INEC, represented by Issiaka Mohammed Dikko (SAN), challenged the petitioner’s claims, labeling their alleged victory as unrealistic and lacking substantial evidence.

Chief Wale Olanipekun (SAN), representing the second respondent, Engr. A.A. Sule, pointed out various objections raised during the petitioner’s case and requested the tribunal to dismiss the petition due to insufficient legal backing for the petitioner’s claims. He noted the absence of proper witness testimonies and inadmissible evidence, including the BVAS, and emphasized that the petitioner failed to mention any polling units where they received 25% of the votes.

Dr. Hassan Mohammed Liman, representing the third respondent, APC, supported the objections to witnesses and urged the tribunal to dismiss the entire petition. He adopted the second respondent’s appeal and highlighted the margin of lead declared in favor of A.A. Sule by Form EC8B and EC8D. Liman argued that the petitioner relied on allegations rather than facts, effectively undermining their own case.

The Nasarawa State Election Tribunal now faces the challenging task of weighing these arguments and evidence to make a fair and just decision regarding the election results. The legal battle continues as all parties await the tribunal’s final ruling.

Hot this week

IHR Commends President Tinubu for Hajj Fare Reduction, Seeks ₦1,000/$1 Concessionary Exchange Rate

By Jabiru HassanIndependent Hajj Reporters (IHR) has commended President...

Nasarawa Governor, Ministers Commend NCDC at Policy Review Retreat in Lafia

By Israel Adamu, JosThe Minister of Regional Development, Engr....

NCDMB Strengthens Local Content With New Certification System

The Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) has...

Kogi Court Sentences 28-Year-Old Husseini Mustapha to Life Imprisonment for Rape

By Noah Ocheni, LokojaThe Kogi State High Court sitting...

Olawepo-Hashim Accuses APC Elements of Orchestrating Smear Campaign Ahead of 2027 Elections

By Achadu Gabriel, KadunaFormer presidential candidate Dr. Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim...

WHO Eyes 2030 As Year For Achievement of Refractive Eye Care For All

By Joyce Remi-BabayejuAs the world marks the 2025...

FERMA Flag-off ‘Operation Safeguard the Road’ in Kogi

By Noah Ocheni, LokojaThe Managing Director/Chief Executive...

Governor Ododo Bags Another National Honour in Education

By Noah Ocheni, LokojaKogi State Governor, Ahmed Usman Ododo,...

Governor Ododo Congratulates Prof. Joash Amupitan SAN on His Appointment as INEC Chairman

By Noah Ocheni, LokojaKogi State Governor, Alhaji Ahmed Usman...

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img