x

Judges’ Transfer not about Nnamdi Kanu – Appeal Court

The Court of Appeal headquarters in Abuja on Tuesday clarified that the transfer of its 21 Justices to various divisions in the country has nothing to do with the judgment of the Court that discharged and quashed the terrorism charges against the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu.

Contrary to a report in a section of the media, the Appellate Court said that the postings of 21 out of its 81 Justices was a routine exercise aimed at reinvigorating the justice delivery of the Court.

The Chief Registrar of the Court, Malam Umar Mohammed Bangari, in a statement denied the media report that the three Justices who delivered the October 13 judgment that ordered the release of Kanu from detention were transferred.

In the statement he personally signed, the Chief Registrar said that only one Justice out of the three that handled Kanu’s matter was affected by the postings.

The statement read in part “The attention of the Court of Appeal has been drawn to a publication in the media on Monday October 24, 2022 with a caption “Nnamdi Kanu: 3 Justices on Appeal Court Panel Transferred”

“The publication in question conveyed the innuendo to the effect that the recent postings of Justices of the Court of Appeal were in connection with or in response to the judgment of the Court of 13th October 2022 in Nnamdi Kanu Versus the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“We wish to state categorically that the general postings of the Justices of the Court of Appeal under reference were routine and aimed at reinvigorating the justice delivery system of the Court.

“In fact, 21 out of 81 Justices including 6 Presiding Justices of the Court were affected by the general postings.

“It is therefore incorrect to insinuate that the Honourable Justices who delivered the judgment in the Nnamdi Kanu appeal were the targets of the routine posting exercise.

“A few minutes of inquiry by the media could have clarified the fact.

“We appeal to the media to exercise restraint and circumspection in reporting matters pertaining to the Court and its operations.

“The Court of Appeal has an open door policy of providing easy access to the media to make inquiries and seek clarification on any matters of interest to the media for the benefit of the general public.”

Hot this week

Understanding China’s ‘Two Sessions’ and Their Global Significance

China’s Two Sessions are the country’s most significant annual...

Ombugadu’s Exit and the Reconfiguration of Nasarawa Politics Ahead of 2027

From Abel Zwanke, LafiaThe resignation of Ombugadu Emmanuel from...

Pastor Warns VeryDarkMan: ‘Fake Death Stunt Invites Real Danger’

Controversial social commentator VeryDarkMan has drawn criticism from cleric...

Mandana Karimi Praises Donald Trump, Compares Him to Cyrus the Great

Iranian-born Bollywood actor Mandana Karimi has publicly praised former...

$200m Project: President Tinubu is Behind My Success — Uba Sani

By Achadu Gabriel, KadunaGovernor Uba Sani has revealed that...

My credentials are valid, Deputy Speaker, Kalu denies alleged certificate forgery

By Our CorrespondentThe Deputy Speaker of the House of...

The Power List: Women Driving Gender Advocacy in Nigeria

International Women’s Day Special FeatureVoices of Impact: The Advocates...

Uba Sani Urges Journalists to Remain Vigilant Against Threats to Democracy

By Achadu Gabriel, KadunaKaduna State Governor, Senator Uba...

World Bank Commends Kogi Governor Ododo for Expanding Healthcare Access

From Noah Ocheni, LokojaThe World Bank has commended...

Gunmen Kill One, Abduct 13 in Multiple Attacks Across Kogi Communities

From Noah Ocheni, LokojaSuspected kidnappers have killed one...

Contempt: Court orders arrest of Asekun, revokes Richard’s bail

By Ogenyi OgenyiA Federal High Court in Lagos has...

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img