x

Judges’ Transfer not about Nnamdi Kanu – Appeal Court

The Court of Appeal headquarters in Abuja on Tuesday clarified that the transfer of its 21 Justices to various divisions in the country has nothing to do with the judgment of the Court that discharged and quashed the terrorism charges against the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu.

Contrary to a report in a section of the media, the Appellate Court said that the postings of 21 out of its 81 Justices was a routine exercise aimed at reinvigorating the justice delivery of the Court.

The Chief Registrar of the Court, Malam Umar Mohammed Bangari, in a statement denied the media report that the three Justices who delivered the October 13 judgment that ordered the release of Kanu from detention were transferred.

In the statement he personally signed, the Chief Registrar said that only one Justice out of the three that handled Kanu’s matter was affected by the postings.

The statement read in part “The attention of the Court of Appeal has been drawn to a publication in the media on Monday October 24, 2022 with a caption “Nnamdi Kanu: 3 Justices on Appeal Court Panel Transferred”

“The publication in question conveyed the innuendo to the effect that the recent postings of Justices of the Court of Appeal were in connection with or in response to the judgment of the Court of 13th October 2022 in Nnamdi Kanu Versus the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

“We wish to state categorically that the general postings of the Justices of the Court of Appeal under reference were routine and aimed at reinvigorating the justice delivery system of the Court.

“In fact, 21 out of 81 Justices including 6 Presiding Justices of the Court were affected by the general postings.

“It is therefore incorrect to insinuate that the Honourable Justices who delivered the judgment in the Nnamdi Kanu appeal were the targets of the routine posting exercise.

“A few minutes of inquiry by the media could have clarified the fact.

“We appeal to the media to exercise restraint and circumspection in reporting matters pertaining to the Court and its operations.

“The Court of Appeal has an open door policy of providing easy access to the media to make inquiries and seek clarification on any matters of interest to the media for the benefit of the general public.”

Hot this week

Defence beyond Guns: Why Human Life Matters 

    By Abu Jemimah Lami Defence is often imagined...

FA Cup Fifth Round Draw Confirmed

The FA Cup fifth-round draw has delivered a blend...

Arsenal Lead as 14 Teams Reach FA Cup Fifth Round

Arsenal stormed into the FA Cup fifth round for...

Kaduna AG Urges Christians to Engage in Politics Ahead of 2027 Elections

By Francis WilfredKaduna State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice,...

Omah Lay Sparks Concern With New Video

Nigerian singer Omah Lay, born Omah Stanley Didia, has...

Many Injured as Violence Erupts at APC Ward Congress in Oluyole

The All Progressives Congress ward congress in Oluyole local...

Gov Eno’s late wife’s Foundation empowers 53,000 in A’ibom

By Ogenyi Ogenyi,UyoAt least persons in Akwa Ibom has...

China Dazzles the World with Its Spring Festival

Olalekan A. BabatundeAs the lunar calendar ushered in the...

Gov Eno’s Late Wife’s Foundation Empowers 53,987 in Akwa Ibom

By Ogenyi Ogenyi, UyoNo fewer than 53,987 persons have...

Community Self-Defense Groups in Nigeria: Solution or Future Security Risk?

By Daudu Agaba Andrew SamuelAs insecurity continues to stretch...

Three Years of Impactful Services: Hazras Charity Foundation

By Abdullateef Abdulkadir.On the 15th of February, 2026, Hazras...

Motorists, Road Users Seek Increased Funding for (FERMA)

By Jabiru HassanMotorists and other road users have called...

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img