Tag: lawmakers

  • CHRAN faults Tinubu’s N70b palliatives for Lawmakers

    CHRAN faults Tinubu’s N70b palliatives for Lawmakers

    By Ogenyi Ogenyi,Uyo

    The Center for Human Rights and Accountability Network (CHRAN) has expressed disappointment over the allocation of N70B of President Bola Tinubu’e palliative fund to National Assembly members.

    It has however lauded the President for declaring a state of emergency on food security, noting that it was a timely intervention given the devastating effects of flooding, rising cost of farm inputs in the country.

    The Human Rights Group made the assertion in a statement endorsed by its State Director in Akwa Ibom , Mr Franklyn Isong and Deputy Director, Public Affairs, Comrade Vincent Aluu made available to newsmen in Uyo yesterday.

    It said the allocation under the guise of “supporting the working conditions of new members,” was unfair and a great disservice to the masses of the country who have continued to ensure ultold suffering caused by lack of people oriented policies of successive administrations in the country.

    It therefore urged Tinubu to have a rethink on the allocation and initiate people’s centric and good welfare programmes that would reduce inflation, unemployment, create empowerment and capacity building through skills acquisition, saying these programmes would have direct bearing on the poor masses.

    CHRAN further faulted the planned N500b palliative to 12 million households to be placed on N8000 stipends per month for six months, wondering what the paltry sum of N267.00 per day could so for a Nigerian given the present low purchasing power of the Naira.

    It querried the method used by the federal government to determine the benefitting households, insisting that the programme would be another political settlement for the political class and the rich in the corridors of the government at the detriment of the poor masses.

    The organisation noted that the inability of the Nigerian government to identify and properly track its citizens through a well documented national register despite the proliferation of biometric identifications renders the programme a wasteful political venture.

    It urged Tinubu to expedite action in privatising or outright sell of the nation’s refineries and to make policies favouring modular refineries as permanent solution to the fuel subsidy removal rather than coming up with temporary measure that will only serve the interest of the political class.

    The group commended the President for approving the immediate release of fertilizers and other farm inputs to help in boosting food security in Nigeria.

  • It’s Unconstitutional, Immoral For Lawmakers To Decide Their Salaries – Obasanjo

    It’s Unconstitutional, Immoral For Lawmakers To Decide Their Salaries – Obasanjo

    Former president, Olusegun Obasanjo, has said it is unconstitutional and immoral for lawmakers to decide their salaries, adding that those who should uphold the law were the ones undermining it.

    Obasanjo stated this while delivering a speech at the 60th anniversary celebration of legal icon Aare Afe Babalola’s call to the Bar held in Ado Ekiti on Monday, July 10.

    He said fixing of salaries for elected officials is the responsibility of the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) but lawmakers now fix salaries for themselves.

    “Under paragraph 32(a-e) of Part I to the third schedule of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), the commission is saddled with determining the remuneration appropriate for political officeholders, including legislators, among other functions. The point in Nigeria which I have seen and which I can attest to is most of the people who are supposed to be operationalising or managing and seeing the constitution and democracy move forward, they are actually the ones who undermine the constitution.

    All elected people, by our constitution, their emolument is supposed to be fixed by the revenue mobilisation commission, but our lawmakers set that aside and they make laws and put any emolument for themselves. Even if that is constitutional, it is not moral and, of course, it is neither constitutional nor moral.” he said

  • Lawmakers Make Case For Almajiri, Out-Of-School-Children In Nigeria

    Lawmakers Make Case For Almajiri, Out-Of-School-Children In Nigeria

    The House of Representatives on Wednesday passed for second reading, a bill seeking to establish a national commission for almajiri education and out-of-school-children.

    The bill, sponsored by Shehu Balarabe Kakale and 18 others, is titled: ‘A Bill for an Act to establish National Commission for Almajiri Education and out of School Children’.

     It seeks to provide for a multimodal system of education to tackle the menace of Illiteracy, develop skill acquisition and entrepreneurship programmes, prevent youth poverty, delinquency and destitution in Nigeria.

    Speaker Femi Gbajabiamila said: “Education has been a top in our legislative agenda. We have just concluded a two day summit on tertiary education, we hope that at the end of the day, we’ll make recommendations”.

  • Lawmakers Urge Police to Investigate Murder of Kano Lady by Chinese Man

    Lawmakers Urge Police to Investigate Murder of Kano Lady by Chinese Man

    The House of Representatives has urged the Inspector General of Police (IG), Usman Alkali Baba, to direct a thorough investigation into the gruesome murder of a young lady, Ummulkulthum Buhari, who was allegedly killed by her Chinese boyfriend, Mr. Geng Quanrong, in her parents’ house in Kano State.

    Following outrage by Nigerians at the weekend calling for the Chinese man prosecution, the Chinese Business Community in Nigeria (CBCAN) last Monday while condemning the murder, backed the call.

    The lawmakers ordered the suspension of the activities of the company the Chinese man works, pending the determination of the legal status of the accused.

    They mandated its Committee on Interior to visit and commiserate with the immediate family of the deceased and the people and Government of Kano State over the death of their daughter, saying the death would not only hurt her family but was also a huge blow to the good people of the state and Nigeria at large.

    The resolutions followed the adoption of a motion of urgent national importance sponsored by Hon. Kabiru Alhassan Rurum at the plenary yesterday.

    Moving the motion, Rurum noted that the deceased was allegedly killed by Quanrong at about 9:30 p.m. with a premeditated intention to commit the provocative act.

    He said it took the Chinese man more than an hour to force himself into the room of the deceased shows that the attack and subsequent killing of the deceased person was a well thought out plan by him.

    The legislator expressed concerns that five days after the murder, the Nigerian Police are yet to come out with a preliminary report on their investigation.

    Rurum said: “Notes the gruesome murder of a young lady, Ummulkulthum Buhari, on Friday September 16, 2022, while in her House at Janbulo, Dorayi Babba in Gwale Local Government Area of Kano State. Also, the deceased was a Corps Member serving in Sokoto State.

    “Cognizant of the fact that the constitutional duty of the government as contained in Section 14, sub 2(b) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (As Amended) that the security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of the government, it should be taken more

    seriously as the family members of the deceased and citizens of Kano State and Nigerians at large are calling for justice.”

    Adopting the motion, the House observed a minute silence for the deceased.

  • APC Chairman Worried By Current Defections By Party Lawmakers

    APC Chairman Worried By Current Defections By Party Lawmakers

    The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) Abdullahi Adamu has expressed concern over the wave of defections of federal lawmakers in the party to opposition parties.

    He said this on Wednesday after a closed-door meeting with party members at the National Assembly.

    Senator Adamu admitted that while the party is worried about the gale of defections, nothing can be done about it.

    Read Also: President Buhari Sends Ministerial List To Senate For Screening

    According to him, defections are normal during an election year as those who feel dissatisfied with the outcome of party primaries are free to test their popularity in other political parties.

    Adamu’s comment came a day after two Senators from the party defected to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    The senators are Ahmed Keita representing Katsina north and Senator Francis Alimikhena representing Edo North.

  • Party Defection: Tension as Imo Speaker, Deputy, 15 Other Lawmakers Face Sack

    Party Defection: Tension as Imo Speaker, Deputy, 15 Other Lawmakers Face Sack

    There are possibilities that 17 members of the Imo State House of Assembly, who at various times defected from the parties under which they were elected, may vacate their office.

    This followed the recent sacking of Ebonyi State Governor, Dave Umahi and some lawmakers who defected with him from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) – on whose ticket they were elected – to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Another court had also sacked 20 members of the Cross River State House of Assembly who defected with Governor Ben Ayade from the PDP to APC.

    Encouraged by these developments, the plaintiffs in Imo have dusted up a suit they filed against the defection of the lawmakers in July 2020.

    The suit was filed by representatives of Legal Defence and Assistance Project, Chijioke Nwachukwu, Chibuzo Ekene and Mmerole Modestus (the plaintiffs) against the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Clerk of the House, Independent National Electoral Commission, Attorney General of the Federation, Hon Collins Chiji, Hon. Amarachi Chyna Iwuanyanwu, Uju Onwudiwe and 15 others.

    In suit No. FHC/Ow/27/2020 filed by their counsel, Nath Epele and Co., the plaintiffs asked the Federal High Court sitting in Owerri to declare the seat of the defendants vacant by virtue of the fact that they defected from the party that elected them into another party.

    Former Speaker Collins Chiji representing Isiala Mbano had left his former party, the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) under whose platform he got to the House and defected to PDP which won the 2019 governorship election in the state in order to grab the Speakership.

    However, a few days after January 14, 2019, Supreme Court judgment, which sacked Emeka Ihedioha and declared Hope Uzodimma of the APC as governor, Chiji, along with other members, moved to the APC to retain his position.

    Chiji and majority leader, Mr. Chigozie Nwaneri, announced their defection on the floor of the House, while others wrote letters of defection.

    Others who were elected under the Action Alliance (AA) also dumped the party and joined the APC.

    They are; Chyna Amara Iwuanyanwu (Nwangele LGA); Innocent Egwim (Ideato North LGA); Chidiebere Ogbunikpa (Okigwe LGA); Obinna Okwara (Nkwerre LGA); Paul Emeziem (Onuimo LGA); Ekene Nnodim (Orsu LGA); Duru Johnson (Ideato South LGA); Ngozi Obiefule (Isu) and Herculus Okoro (Ohaji-Egbema) and the minority leader, Ekene Nnodumele (APGA Orsu).

    A few days later, Eddy Obinna (Aboh Mbaise), Samuel Otibe (Ahiazu Mbaise) and Uche Ogbagu (Ikeduru) all of PDP, defected to APC.

    Some months later, the leadership of the House was changed as Mr. Paul Emeziem of Onuimo replaced Chiji as Speaker, while Iwuanyanwu became the deputy speaker.

    No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

  • BREAKING: Court sacks 20 Cross River Lawmakers for defecting to APC

    BREAKING: Court sacks 20 Cross River Lawmakers for defecting to APC

    The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, on Monday, sacked 20 members of the Cross River State House of Assembly that defected from the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, to the ruling All Progressive Congress, APC.

    The court, in a judgement that was delivered by Justice Taiwo Taiwo, held that the lawmakers, having abandoned the political party that sponsored them to power, ought to vacate their seats.

    The judgement followed a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/975/2021, which was filed by the PDP.

    Details Shortly…

  • Ukraine: UK sanctions 386 Russian lawmakers

    Ukraine: UK sanctions 386 Russian lawmakers

    By Becky Adi

    Britain on Friday slapped a fresh wave of sanctions on Moscow, targeting 386 members of Russia’s parliament who supported President Vladimir Putin’s devastating invasion of Ukraine.

    The new sanctions against members of Russia’s Duma, the lower house of parliament, ban them from travelling to Britain as well as accessing any assets they hold in the UK.

    The lawmakers were sanctioned after they voted in February to recognise the breakaway republics of Lugansk and Donetsk in eastern Ukraine, providing a pretext for the war, Britain’s foreign ministry said.

    “We’re targeting those complicit in Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine and those who support this barbaric war,” Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said.

    “We will not let up the pressure and will continue to tighten the screw on the Russian economy through sanctions.”

    The move came after the government on Thursday froze the assets of Chelsea Football Club’s Russian owner Roman Abramovich, the highest-profile oligarch yet sanctioned by any Western country.

    Abramovich, 55, was one of seven more oligarchs slapped with new British restrictions over the invasion, including his former business partner Oleg Deripaska.

    Prime Minister Boris Johnson had been accused of delaying action against wealthy Russians, and turning a blind eye to Russian money that has coursed through London since the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    Russian vessels and aircraft are already barred from the UK.

    AFP

  • Lawmakers Against Gender Bills Don’t Have Respect for Women – Minister of Women Affairs

    Lawmakers Against Gender Bills Don’t Have Respect for Women – Minister of Women Affairs

    Pauline Tallen, minister of women affairs, says the male lawmakers who voted against gender bills seeking to amend the constitution have no respect for women.

    The lawmakers, on Tuesday, voted against bills seeking to promote more opportunities for women in political parties and governance.

    Speaking on the development on Wednesday after the meeting of the federal executive council (FEC) presided over by Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo, Tallen said Nigerian women are already strategising on the next line of action.

    “It clearly shows that the men that were against the bill don’t have any respect for women; it’s clear. But I am not generalising; not all the men in the national assembly. We have the figures — 72 men in the house of representatives voted in support of the bill. So, I’m not generalising,’ she said.

    “We are saying that for those that don’t believe in it, we will continue to intensify advocacy for them to believe in gender equality and the role that women can play when they are on the decision table to make Nigeria better.

    “Other strategies have also been put in place, which I will not disclose now. But we are putting strategies towards the 2023 elections. And we know what to do by the grace of God.”

    Speaking on the national gender policy which was approved by the FEC, she said it is a relief compared to what happened at the national assembly on Tuesday.

    “What happened is unfortunate — on the first day of March which is the month to acknowledge and celebrate women. However, what happened today in council is a big relief, and is a reassurance of President Muhammadu Buhari’s administration, that he believes in women, and that this administration will continue to support all issues that will support women towards national development,” she said.

  • Electoral Bill: Govs, Lawmakers Clash Over New Clauses

    Electoral Bill: Govs, Lawmakers Clash Over New Clauses

    The clash between governors and federal lawmakers over two new clauses may affect the signing of the re-amended electoral bill, Daily Trust reports.

    The National Assembly had on Monday transmitted the re-amended electoral bill to President Muhammadu Buhari for assent after addressing the reservations expressed on the previous amendments made to the electoral act.

    The president had last year withheld his assent over the provision of direct primaries as the sole mode for political parties to select their candidates for elections. In the reworked bill, the lawmakers provided three options; direct, indirect and consensus. They also introduced two clauses, which have opened another round of power play.

    Daily Trust reports that like the previous amendments, the governors are allegedly all out to thwart the assent to the latest bill.

    The contentious clauses

    The bill in Section 84(9) (a) provides that, “A political party that adopts a consensus candidate shall secure the written consent of all cleared aspirants for the position, indicating their voluntary withdrawal from the race and their endorsement of the consensus candidate.”

    It goes further in paragraph (b) to say that, “Where a political party is unable to secure the written consent of all cleared aspirants for the purpose of a consensus candidate, it shall revert to the choice of direct or indirect primaries for the nomination of candidates for the aforesaid elective positions.”

    The bill states in paragraph (c) that, “A special convention or nomination congress shall be held to ratify the choice of consensus candidates at designated centres at the national, state, senatorial, federal and state constituencies, as the case may be.”

    The second contentious clause in the re-amended bill provides that all political office holders at the state and federal levels should resign before the primary election for any elective office they are seeking.

    Why some govs are not comfortable

    Some sources with knowledge of happenings at the Villa and the National Assembly told one of our correspondents that some of the 36 state governors saw the ‘improved electoral act’ submitted to President Buhari as a booby trap set up by legislators to whittle down their influence ahead of the general elections.

    “They are not satisfied with the clauses on consensus candidature and the one asking political appointees to resign before the primary election of political parties,” one of the sources said.

    “Some of the governors are in cohort with some political appointees like ministers and heads of some agencies and all of them belief in one thing- to guarantee their personal interests and something that will favour their cronies at the end of the day. It is about controlling the instruments of power and the electoral act is one of them.

    “If you ask all aspirants to sign a letter of commitment before using the consensus option for primaries, or sign a commitment after someone emerged, one or two of them may not sign provided that they know they are popular but not in the good books of the governor.

    “Also, if you ask some ministers and heads of juicy agencies to resign some months to primary elections, they know that they would be stripped of some powers and resources at their disposal. They are also not sure if they would be reappointed.

    “So, this is basically the reason for the move by these people to discourage the president from signing the electoral act,” he said.

    Another source said President Muhammadu Buhari has to weigh all options in order to get it right.

    “The election is fast approaching…There are some governors and elected officials who want to take advantage of the present confusion to remain in absolute control of what is going to happen.

    “Also, there are some legislators who were all out to tackle the governors. They too, it’s just for their selfish interest. Remember over 70 per cent of senators or members of the House of Representatives rarely go back after each election season.

    “So, some of them want to reverse the trend, which they feel the governors are responsible. My prayer is that President Buhari will take a decision that will favour the generality of Nigerians,” he said.

    Daily Trust could not get the response of the governors on why they are not comfortable with the two new clauses.

    ‘Sign bill now’

    The National Assembly Caucus of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has called on President Buhari to assent to the re-amended Electoral Bill transmitted to him.

    The PDP lawmakers made the call on Tuesday during their caucus meeting with members of the Board of Trustees (BOT) of the party at the National Assembly, Abuja.

    The Senate Minority Leader, Enyinnaya Abaribe, said having bent backwards as requested by President Muhammadu Buhari on the earlier rejected electoral bill, the proposed law should be signed without any delay.

    Also, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, Ndudi Elumelu alleged that APC governors were lobbying the president not to sign the bill.

    He, however, urged President Buhari not to yield to the request of the governors but to sign the bill owing to its importance to strengthening the country’s electoral process.

    What APC lawmakers discussed

    Meanwhile, senators who are members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) caucus declined to comment on the outcome of their caucus meeting, which lasted for about two hours behind closed doors.

    Senate President Ahmad Lawan, his deputy, Ovie Omo-Agege, Leader, Yahaya Abdullahi, other principal officers belonging to the party and many others attended the emergency meeting, which commenced by 2.30pm and ended at 4.30pm.

    The meeting held simultaneously with that of the PDP National Assembly caucus with its Board of Trustees (BoT) members led by Walid Jibrin.

    While the PDP’s meeting was held in the presence of the media, APC lawmakers declined to comment on the outcome of their meeting when approached by newsmen.

    But a former governor, who is a ranking lawmaker, told Daily Trust that the issue of the electoral bill was a done deal, hence it was not discussed at the meeting.

    He said their closed doors meeting was to discuss the forthcoming convention of the party and the crisis rocking the party.

    “We met to review the crisis rocking our party and the forthcoming convention. We don’t want our party to explode after the convention. It was resolved that the crisis rocking our state chapters be resolved before the convention,” he said.

    Asked why two clauses were introduced, he said they added them to enhance the electoral process of the country.

    “Yes, we included the clauses because we are lawmakers and we have the constitutional rights to make or amend laws that would be in the best interests.

    “Previously, the consensus was done to favour the governors but now we have amended the clauses to favour all,” he said.

    He expressed optimism that President Buhari will assent the bill, saying we have addressed the reservations expressed by him.

    Another Senator told Daily Trust that it was Senator Yusuf Yusuf (APC, Taraba), who is representing the Senate in the Buni-caretaker committee that briefed them on the activities of the committee.

    “He briefed us on what is happening in the party and the forthcoming convention. We took turns to lament the lingering crisis in some of our state chapters. We did not discuss the electoral bill,” he said, insisting that it was purely party issues that were discussed.

    ‘Level playing ground for all’

    Reacting, Professor Kamilu Sani Fage, a renowned political scientist, observed that the two clauses are important innovations and President Buhari should not succumb to pressure from governors or any other political appointees to circumvent the wish and aspiration of the masses.

    He said the clause that says ministers and all other appointees must resign before contesting for primaries is very important because it will sanitise the country’s election process.

    Prof Fage, who is of the Department of Political Science in Bayero University, Kano, said the president should sign the bill.

    “He should not accept or go down to the pressure of political appointees. After all, they are representing Nigerians; so, if they are true democrats, they should accept the aspirations and verdicts of Nigerians rather than use their own power to tinker or change the provisions and the will of Nigerians.”

    ‘Consensus again?’

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Professor Paul Ananaba, has questioned the inclusion of the clause on consensus in the amended Electoral Act, adding that it would cause a violation of rights.

    He said the nomination of political parties’ candidates is an internal affair of the party, which cannot be legislated upon by the National Assembly or the judiciary.

    “Does the law also state how a person can withdraw consent?” he asked. Ananaba said the consensus is not wrong if it is not imposed but is by consent.

    Malami Reacts

    Amid allegations that the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Abubakar Malami (SAN) will influence the decision of the president on the electoral bill, his office explained that Malami has no business “pressuring” President Muhammadu Buhari to reject the Amended Electoral Act retransmitted to him.

    Speaking to Daily Trust, media aide to the minister, Dr Umar Gwandu said the minister does his functions in accordance with the dictates of the law, adding that “his role as contained in extant laws does not include “mounting pressure on the president.”

    According to him, “The president is an executive president with all the powers vested in him by the constitution and extant laws,” he said.

    He said the president and members of the cabinet, including the AGF act in the public interest.

    “It does not sync with common sense to assume that the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) would mount pressure on the president,” he said.

    By Ismail Mudashir, Abdullateef Salau, Balarabe Alkassim, John C. Azu (Abuja) & Clement A. Oloyede (Kano)