By Milcah Tanimu
A heated debate has emerged between former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and the current Presidency amid the ongoing #EndBadGovernance protests, which are focused on addressing hunger and economic hardships in Nigeria.
Atiku Abubakar, who was the 2023 presidential candidate for the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has issued a stern warning to Nigeria’s military leadership. In a recent statement on X, Atiku cautioned that any military personnel responsible for authorizing lethal force against peaceful protesters could face charges of crimes against humanity, even post-retirement.
Emphasizing the importance of the constitutional right to protest, Atiku called on the government and security forces to ensure a safe environment for peaceful demonstrations. He highlighted that this right is upheld by Nigeria’s constitution and reinforced by the judiciary.
In response, presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga criticized Atiku for failing to address the instances of looting and violence that have marred the protests. Onanuga suggested that Atiku should follow the example of opposition figures in the UK, who have condemned riots and supported government efforts to maintain order.
Onanuga defended the security forces, commending their professionalism and restraint during the protests. He also pointed out that while Section 40 of the 1999 constitution guarantees the right to protest, Section 45 allows for limitations related to public order and safety.
The exchange underscores the growing divide between the government and opposition regarding the handling of the protests and the balance between maintaining public safety and upholding constitutional rights.
