x

Deployment of Public Funds in Defence of Electoral Victory: Time to Stop Written

By Tochu Okorie

The involvement of the judiciary in deciding elections in Nigeria remains a sore thumb in our leadership recruitment process fuelling impunity in governance and associated socio-economic pains. That is not as radically destructive and embarrassing for a country in cryonically frozen development as politicians deploying huge amounts of public funds defending in court positions they took by stealth and brigandage.

Hardly ever have major elections been decided without the agony of protracted litigations which ultimately ends in upending the will of the people as expressed in the ballot. Many political office holders in Nigeria today occupy exalted offices by the magnanimity of the courts rather than by any popular mandate. This happens because they manage to force their way into office and then deploy huge amounts of public funds, now at their disposal, in defending the stolen election in court. This has to change if Nigeria hopes to develop its political system in the near future.

Practically speaking, the economic and socio-cultural crises that continue to hunt Nigeria redounds from the absence of moral fibre in our political framework. Reasons are not far-fetched. Political office holders do not feel any indebtedness, not to speak of allegiance, to the people. This owes to the fact that they were chosen for that office not by the popular mandate of the people but by the whims of a convoluted judicial process, procured with public funds which they usually would deploy with reckless abandon.

As a result, they conduct their affairs in thoughtless disregard of the interest of the people and the common good. They carry on with unbridled impunity knowing they will never have any recourse to the people at any other time. They will always get by through the courts as long as they have unrestricted access to the public tills.

Can anyone blame the judiciary for doing their legitimate duty of adjudicating cases brought before them? Of course, no. What is unfortunate is that the judiciary has allegedly turned the opportunity into a bazaar of sorts making brisk business out the whole shenanigan. Would the litigants have been spending from their respective pockets on both sides and not one from the common purse and another from his personal funds, one would not have been so badly furious.

It is unjust, corrupt and immoral to allow the deployment of public funds in pursuit of personal electoral victory in the courts. No country in the world ever develops that way. We will continue to be mired in the murky waters of underdevelopment for as long as we continue to tolerate a confused leadership recruitment pattern that is clearly damaging to our cherished ethos and undermines our glib tiny developmental efforts.

Thankfully, electoral reform is a continuous process and can still accommodate fundamental changes in order to bring the electoral process to a desired equilibrium. This means there is the urgent need to evolve a system that allows the entire gamut of the post-election legal process to be concluded before anyone is sworn into office. That way the practice of capturing the public purse and deploying same in defence of often manipulated victory will be brought to a permanent halt.

It is awful enough that our elections have taken the backburner giving way for the courts to exult as the ultimate determiners but no more should gladiators in the arena of politics be allowed to force themselves into office and then turn around to spend billions of public funds in the pursuit of that legal process.

It therefore becomes imperative that the National Assembly must rise with courage in the approach to the next amendment to the Electoral Act and even the Constitution, and make adequate provision of time. In this regard, I take the view that elections could be conducted in October the year preceding handover allowing seven clear months within which all legal matters attendant to the election must be concluded. Early election poses no threat to anyone save riggers whose market will no longer sell.

Tochu Okorie, a Public Affairs analyst, writes from Abuja and can be reached via toksokorie@gmail.com

Hot this week

Military investigation ends: DHQ moves to arraign alleged coup plotters

The Armed Forces of Nigeria (AFN) have confirmed that...

Rivers Assembly Crisis: CSOs, APC Leaders Demand NASS Intervention

Civil society organisations, media professionals, and leaders of the...

UTAN–BRAMA: Fresh Facts Emerge as Justice Ministry Clears Aondoakaa of Involvement

Fresh facts have emerged in the long-running Utan–BRAMA victims’...

Gyang Dung Gyang Condemns Killing of Miners in Kuru, Calls for Urgent Security Action

Gyang Dung Gyang, a Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) aspirant...

2026 budget proposal, Electoral Act to get legislative attention — Deputy speaker

The Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Benjamin...

Court Allows Yahaya Bello to Travel for 2026 Lesser Hajj

A Federal High Court in Abuja has granted former...

Halima Abubakar Alleges Eviction From Abuja Home Over Rent Dispute

Nollywood actress Halima Abubakar has said she was asked...

Reps Urge FG to Harmonise Poverty Reduction Programmes

The House of Representatives has urged the Federal Government...

Kano Commissioner Urges Deputy Governor to Resign After APC Defection

The Kano State Commissioner for Information and Internal Affairs,...

Adamawa Governorship: Stakeholders Endorse Senator Aminu Abbas

Senator Aminu Iya Abbas, a seasoned politician and chartered...

Rivers political crisis: Amagbein urges Tinubu to intervene, settle Wike, Fubara

By Our CorrespondentNiger Delta former freedom fighter, the...

Doctor says I have only weeks left to live — Singer Ray J

American singer and reality television personality Ray J says...

APGA Releases Timetable for 2026 Anambra LG Primaries

The All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) has released its...

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img