Prof. Ighodalo Eromosele
The role of bureaucracy in the effective, efficient and timeous implementation of policies of government is underscored by the recent meeting of President Bola Tinubu in February 2024, with the Head of Civil Service of the Federation, the body of Permanent Secretaries and some Directors-General of agencies at the State House, Abuja. He reportedly warned that ineffectiveness and unnecessary bureaucracy which result in delays in interventions of the government will not be tolerated, and directed inter alia, “Before the next meeting, I want to see progress in the civil service…”
It may be recalled that a contentious issue in the face-off between the Federal Government and the Academic Staff Union of Universities was the use of the Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System when the university was migrated from the Government Integrated Financial Management System. The objection to IPPIS by ASUU was because of the plethora of encumbrances that the payment platform imposed on the management of the university system notably, inflexibility in the recruitment of staff, regular and short-term. Specifically, the IPPIS has no provision for visiting staff, the hallmark of universities worldwide, which allows for the free movement of academics on short-term visits for teaching and research. Similarly, it does not allow for the timeous replacement of academic staff exiting the universities for sundry reasons without recourse to the Ministry of Finance for permission, which often is not granted without extraneous conditions.
More vexatious is the fact that the IPPIS has no provision for arrears on salaries for academics promoted to the ranks in the professorial cadre. It is instructive to state that an academic staff for the professorial cadre must first satisfy the gestation time in rank. Second, he must satisfy the requisite scholarly publications in acceptable academic journals. Third, if prima facie qualified for the rank, he must be subjected to external assessment by three scholars in the specific field within or outside the country. Thus, the candidate’s promotion, effective from the year pronounced by the Appointment and Promotion Committee of Council and Senate, is predicated upon positive responses from the external assessors. And when so promoted, for the most part, it is retroactive, for the academic staff, from the date earlier pronounced by A&PC. Regrettably, the IPPIS does not have a provision for promotion arrears thereof. Consequently, many academics are owed promotion arrears spanning over six years because the IPPIS is deficient.
There are many ancillary issues arising from this deficiency; not least is the grand corruption inherent in the continued use of the IPPIS. There is the poignant allegation, in February 2024, against the IPPIS by the Vice-Chancellor, University of Maiduguri, of persons on the staff list unknown to the university but are paid salaries from the platform. In a particular case, the person resides in Lagos. In light of this, there is a compelling need for staff audits in all the agencies being serviced by the IPPIS to ascertain the authenticity of staff. What is clear is that an over-centralised system is one inherently prone to catastrophic failure as is evident with the IPPIS. The system does not avail staff pay slips to know what deductions are made from salaries when paid.
Related News
Tinubu eyes $4bn annual savings from reduced bureaucracies
Fresh impetus for restructuring
Discontinue plans for new National ID, HURIWA tells Tinubu
Furthermore, the co-operatives in the university provide avenues for staff to save and obtain credits. The IPPIS in its inefficiency does not remit promptly to co-operatives check-offs from staff salaries. The recent payment of four months’ arrears of salaries of academic staff as directed by President Tinubu has deductions for cooperative spending which, de facto, means incomplete payment of staff salaries. No explanation for the delay in remittance.
It is a bold relief that the National Industrial Court of Nigeria pronounced on the IPPIS as follows: “I declare the claimant (FGN) acted in error to impose IPPIS on the defendant union (ASUU). The issue of what payment platform is to be used in paying the salaries or wages of staff of the university is one that is within the discretion of individual councils of the universities in line with the autonomy granted them by the University (Miscellaneous Provision)(Amendment) Act 2003.”
It is equally a bold relief that the Federal Government accepted the verdict by the directive of President Tinubu after a Federal Executive Council meeting presided over by him in December 2023 directing the migration of all tertiary institutions from IPPIS. Reiterating the significance of the presidential directive, the Minister of Information and National Orientation said, “What that means in simple language is that the university authorities and other tertiary institutions will now be paying their personnel from their end instead of relying on IPPIS.” Correct.
But four months after the presidential directive on the subject, university staff members are still being paid on IPPIS, nay and strangely ‘New IPPIS’, sign-posting bureaucratic disconnect, quod erat demonstrandum. Admitting, the presidential directive was silent on the platform to migrate to. The logical action expedient in this circumstance is the migration to GIFMIS to which ASUU was not averse to ab initio. To continue to pay university staff on IPPIS or whatever name is a grave violation of a presidential order validly made in compliance with the verdict of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria.
